On the other hand, what would help A LOT is if someone with a "design eye" would point out specific places in the themes where there are problems and, where possible, suggest alternatives
I'll speak up since I'm a designer as well as a developer (and an end user), and since I find it important that the core themes are brilliant. I took a quick look at the themes before and had kind of a bad feeling about some of it. So I tried to nail down some the individual problems (as I see them). I'm trying to be pragmatic here by commenting on Jeff's work, rather than trying to describe my own perfect dream theme. First, let me just give an overall "Good work"! I know this is work in progress and that some of these may be obvious points that you're already aware of. I've only looked at the front pages, so I won't comment on forms, admin stuff etc. Oh, and I've been reviewing the themes using Safari/ OS X. - General comment: If what we're looking for is eye-candy, something that makes people think great things about Drupal, then I don't think Zen (the original) really does it. Beach and Drop however seem to have a potential to become attractive and solid default themes. On the other hand, Zen feels very functional and might attract people who prefer those qualities. It would probably make a good admin theme. A general feeling though is that there is some unnecessary complexity sometimes. Too many colors, borders, icons etc. Maybe too little whitespace. OK, I'll try to be more specific. - Body text: I think the text size is too big in Zen. Beach is better. Drops is even better since I (and I think people in general) find Verdana more friendly than Arial. How about using Trebuchet MS for one of the themes, maybe just for headings? Line-height (="leading") is far too low in Zen and Beach and too big in Drops. Somewhere in between should be great. - Headings: Way too large in Zen. Beach looks OK but in Drops they're a bit too big. The underlines in linked headings seem a bit too striking although in drops-big they are more subtle which is good. Drops-small has capital letters which is kind of cool but I think they'd have to be smaller so they don't dominate the page completely. - Info text etc: I agree with an earlier poster that the node links/ publication info should not use a serif font when the body text is sans-serif. Try Georgia for the body text in, say, Drops, but make the links sans-serif. They are way too big in Zen (I think there's a pattern here!) and I'd make them a tiny bit smaller in Beach as well. - Icons: In "Recent blog posts", "Active forum topics" and "Who's new" the icons seem more or less superfluous to me. They don't tell me anything about the individual links. Especially the node icons are too striking in this context I think. The user icons seem like the most justified of these three. Another thing about icons is I think they should be as color neutral as possible to make them blend together nicely and work well with different color schemes. Or they could all follow a specific color scheme - that looks great but it makes them less reusable. - Blocks: I like the way the're done in Drops (both versions). They're kind of nice in Beach as well without borders, but they might need more whitespace between them. And smaller headings. I'm not so sure about Zen's blocks. There seem to be too many squares and lines everywhere. Look at the mission statement - there are no borders at all, and I think that looks great! As an example of the opposite, if you move your eye from within a block to the content column you'll cross two lines AND move from gray to white background. Is that necessary? I think the sidebars would look better without the block borders. Maybe use only horizontal borders between the blocks? In Beach the text within blocks should be made smaller so that it's easier to distinguish between blocks and the body text on the page. That's a general rule of thumb I guess; block text should be smaller than the body text IMO. - Colors: Drops looks good in general, Beach even more so - if we fade the yellow background a bit. Zen. I think light grays are nice, especially in an admin theme. But I'd go for a darker header - maybe blue with white text like in the other themes. Zen-fixed. I don't like the purple background. How about white or light blue? - It seems silly to provide both drops-big and drops-small since they're so similar. The main difference is the header image which will often get replaced anyway. By the way, I'm not crazy about the rounded box in the header. I think it has to do with it being at the same time semi-light on the dark header and semi-dark on the white background. I think I'd like it to be either dark or light - or replace it with another solution. - Drops has a too narrow middle column. I suggest you disable the right column. - Fixed vs. Fluid: I think it's obvious from the discussion that we should provide both in core. I prefer fixed since it gives me as a themer control over the proportions between the different elements on the page. But I'm fine with fluid as a default if that is the majority's opinion. - Bonus tip: Include 'Bitstream Vera Sans' with Verdana, 'Bitstream Vera Serif' with Georgia and 'Bitstream Vera Mono' (I think that's it) with Courier - if you haven't already done so. For all the brave Linux users. Well, I could go on about this forever... I have to stop for now, but I'd be happy to review any new versions you guys make. Hope you found some of this useful. /Hannes Lilljequist - zoo33