22 Apr
2006
22 Apr
'06
9:59 p.m.
Op vrijdag 21 april 2006 14:14, schreef Fernando Silva:
But to do this, I must have some "garantie" that the work I would do in flexinode 4.6 would have a port to 4.7; so I can then upgrade and not loose work.
Unfortunately non of us can guarantee this. In fact, I think that we can safely assume that work done for 4.6 flexinode will not be ported to 4.7 without lots of additional effort. On top of that, my #1 priority now, is to get 4.7 stable. After that, we can see what to do with new features for 4.6 and 4.7. and with non-critical bugfixes for 4.6. Unless we have a dedicated 4.6 flexinode maintainer, I also think it is good idea to state that we do not allow ANYTHING but critical bugfixes into the 4.6 flexinode branch. Bèr