On Jun 9, 2005, at 4:02 AM, Christopher Taylor wrote:
I don't know if Flexinode will work because the content will be created by Citizens and Members. THey way not pay attention to volume and issue number per say.
If you have a relatively large group of untrained people creating content, in my experience you have to limit both the number of taxonomies and the number of items in each taxonomy. People don't like to have to figure out how to classify things, and often do it incorrectly or not at all, which defeats your plan.
remember that every node already has a date and time on it, so it may not be necessary to add that again.
I wonder if just two taxonomies would work.
One taxonomy would be a list of the communities.
The second taxonomy would be a list of topics.
This will allow you to categorize material according by community and by topic.
The Volume and Issue information will be of relatively low value, since I can promise almost no one will ever try to retrieve anything that way. No one will say, "I want to find an article in Volume Two, Issue 5." And really, that style of classification is an anachronism designed to help librarians retrieve physical books. It does not add much value when you have full text search capabilities.
Instead, they will say, "I want to find that article about growing apples in your backyard." And they will most likely use the full text search to find the article, not a taxonomy.
I call this the "big bucket, small bucket" problem. When developing a system, the designers often try to create a large number of small buckets on the theory that highly classified information is good, since many of us grew up with libraries, which have detailed classification systems. But those systems evolved in the absence of good search tools.
My preference is to start with a small number of large buckets, because there are fewer places to look for information. With many small buckets (multiple taxonomies with many items), users have to go from bucket to bucket, saying, in essence, "Is it in here? No. Is it in here? No. Is it in here? No.....and so on."
If your system is successful and gets lots of use, you can add additional taxonomies and categories as you see what is popular.
Best regards, Andrew ------------------------------------------------- Andrew Michael Cohill, Ph.D. Information architect
Design Nine provides technology master planning services, community network planning, technology audits, and telecommunications project management to communities and organizations trying to make wise technology and telecommunications expenditures. Design Nine represents the interests of the organization or community, rather than the interests of vendors.
Visit the Design Nine News page for frequently updated news and commentary on technology issues. http://www.designnine.com/news/
Design Nine, Inc. http://www.designnine.com/ Blacksburg, Virginia Voice: 540.951.4400 Cell: 540.320.4406