On Dec 10, 2007 12:36 AM, Neil Adair neila@magma.ca wrote:
Shai Gluskin wrote:
He's in the awkward situation of having to give his employee who administers the site access to his user account in order for the employee to administer the site. And it's not a trivial matter to migrate all his content to another user.
Neil - the discussion so far is about whether or not something like adminrole is a good idea. My contention is that if you believe that using UID1 is bad then using adminrole is nearly as unsafe.
If you use adminrole but also remove many of the privileges then it becomes more safe. However, most paranoid people feel that it's better to consciously enable permissions than have that happen automatically.
Regards, Greg