28 Jul
2005
28 Jul
'05
11:06 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:27:43AM -0400, Jim Dam wrote:
I would think it should be in the source, not the db. That way two different (minor variations in) versions could use the same DB.
That sounds reasonable.
However, it would also be nice if the DB version number were stored in the DB... so that the update script would know which update had last been applied to the DB, eliminating a potentially confusing question at update time.