I , too, like this one. It looks clean without having too many gradients and whatnot going on.
Although, I do like the idea of having an icon set that was created for Drupal. I am not sure how much time I could devote to it, but I have some other contacts that may be interested in helping as well. -------------------------------------- Eric Carroll drupal.org ID: vnotion eric@visualnotion.com --------------------------------------
On May 31, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Øivind Binde wrote:
I would give my vote too this icon package: http://www.silvestre.com.ar/wp-content/uploaded/Neu-0.6-PR3.tar.bz2
morphir
themes-request@drupal.org wrote:
Send themes mailing list submissions to themes@drupal.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to themes-request@drupal.org
You can reach the person managing the list at themes-owner@drupal.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of themes digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (Christian Berg)
- Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (Laura
Scott) 3. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (Trae McCombs) 4. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (grohk) 5. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (Vladimir Zlatanov)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 22:55:22 +0200 From: Christian Berg xeniac@gmx.at Subject: Re: [themes] Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. To: A list for theme developers themes@drupal.org Message-ID: 1149022522.8924.16.camel@localhost.localdomain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Just an idea for Drupal 4.99: Icon-Themes!
Booth GNOME and KDE have support for themes AND icon-themes. Maybe we could add an slick and KISS way for this feature. theme('icon','apply'); If somebody want's an Tango-Iconset, we could host something like this on an external Drupal "Fan-Page".
Additional: Many New Drupal-Contrib Themes are based on oswd.org Designs, that have some restrictions too. for example the andreas01 Theme based on the andreas01 oswd.org Design:
"If you like this layout and would like to use it in any way, you are free to do so. All I ask for is that you leave the "Design by Andreas Viklund" link in the footer of the site. If you would like to remove that line, or if you are interested in professional services that are related to webdesign or this layout (such as custom design, branding, scripting or programming), please contact me through my website for more information!"
Sounds Simmilar to the "CC Bronze" Restrictions to me.
Maybe Drupal Developers should split up the Code from the Presentation also on their Repositories. Drupal.org only hosts Drupal Core and Drupal Code that is absolutly GPL. Drupal-Mods.net or something simmilar hosts a collection of Drupal-Themes, -Hacks, -Mods, Icon-Themes, Whatever, related to Drupal but with other licenses.
Am Dienstag, den 30.05.2006, 22:22 +0200 schrieb Bèr Kessels:
We should find an alternaive that does allow us to go for GPL.
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:08:21 -0600 From: Laura Scott laura@pingv.com Subject: Re: [themes] Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. To: A list for theme developers themes@drupal.org Cc: infrastructure@drupal.org Message-ID: 6C281D70-6F88-4F04-AEAC-056205968897@pingv.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
I'm wondering if we're not trying to apply mileage standards to bicycles. As far as I know, the GPL is about software, not about images.
The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too.
I may be wrong, but don't believe you can GPL an image any more than you can copyright a lawn. We're talking about different kinds of licensing, different kinds of works. An image isn't software. The image format could be considered software, so we could require that images not be in any proprietary format, such as PSD or ia. But that doesn't get to the creative property aspects.
I humbly suggest focusing on the goal, and not on the means. GPL itself is not manna. Its values are what we seek, no?
The closest thing I can find is the Creative Commons Share Alike license. However, I cannot seem to find it anywhere on their website. All of their pre-configured licenses for images require attribution, which defeats the stated goals here. But Share Alike (with the arrow- circle icon) seems to capture exactly what we're after:
Share Alike. You allow others to distribute derivative works only under a license identical to the license that governs your work.
http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses
The other approach would be to require a Public Domain Dedication of the image elements. http://creativecommons.org/license/ publicdomain-2 (I note that CC states this might not be enforceable outside of the US.)
Laura
On May 30, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Bèr Kessels wrote:
Summary so far:It has been decided we cannot use tango. So let us move forward.
We should find an alternaive that does allow us to go for GPL.
Here are some possibilities:
* BlueSphere: http://svgicons.sourceforge.net/ -- SVG, soresizeable without distortion. BSD licence. See also http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=4276 * Shiira: http://hmdt-web.net/shiira/icon-e.html -- several good options imho. * idesk: http://idesk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page (not sure if this has icons or is just a desktop tool) * FreeIcons: http://realopen.org/projects/fics/ * Marbles? http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php? content=1581 -- not sure about licence * XOOPS icons: http://www.nongnu.org/matt-xoops/ * http://themes.freshmeat.net/projects/aquafusion/
And http://www.maxpower.ca/free-icons/2006/03/05/
Lets pick one, or go for the best option: volunteer to design a Drupal-specific set! :)
Bèr
[ End user Drupal services and hosting | Sympal.nl ]
Drupal upgrade repareert kritiek beveiligingslek: http://help.sympal.nl/ drupal_upgrade_repareert_kritiek_beveiligingslek _______________________________________________ themes mailing list themes@drupal.org http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
Message: 3 Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:15:32 -0400 From: "Trae McCombs" traemccombs@gmail.com Subject: Re: [themes] Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. To: "A list for theme developers" themes@drupal.org Message-ID: b4fcd9cb0605301515w2dc82192k619ccc2e93ad2e80@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/i.php?i=git2
Jakub pointed this out to me. It follows the Tango Guidelines, yet is GPL. Perhaps it would be the most suitable replacement.
Someone could have suggested this already, sorry if I missed it. :)
Trae
On 5/30/06, Laura Scott laura@pingv.com wrote:
I'm wondering if we're not trying to apply mileage standards to bicycles. As far as I know, the GPL is about software, not about images.
The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too.
I may be wrong, but don't believe you can GPL an image any more than you can copyright a lawn. We're talking about different kinds of licensing, different kinds of works. An image isn't software. The image format could be considered software, so we could require that images not be in any proprietary format, such as PSD or ia. But that doesn't get to the creative property aspects.
I humbly suggest focusing on the goal, and not on the means. GPL itself is not manna. Its values are what we seek, no?
The closest thing I can find is the Creative Commons Share Alike license. However, I cannot seem to find it anywhere on their website. All of their pre-configured licenses for images require attribution, which defeats the stated goals here. But Share Alike (with the arrow- circle icon) seems to capture exactly what we're after:
Share Alike. You allow others to distribute derivative works only under a license identical to the license that governs your work.
http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses
The other approach would be to require a Public Domain Dedication of the image elements. http://creativecommons.org/license/ publicdomain-2 (I note that CC states this might not be enforceable outside of the US.)
Laura
On May 30, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Bèr Kessels wrote:
Summary so far:It has been decided we cannot use tango. So let us move forward.
We should find an alternaive that does allow us to go for GPL.
Here are some possibilities:
* BlueSphere: http://svgicons.sourceforge.net/ -- SVG, soresizeable without distortion. BSD licence. See also http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=4276 * Shiira: http://hmdt-web.net/shiira/icon-e.html -- several good options imho. * idesk: http://idesk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page (not sure if this has icons or is just a desktop tool) * FreeIcons: http://realopen.org/projects/fics/ * Marbles? http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php? content=1581 -- not sure about licence * XOOPS icons: http://www.nongnu.org/matt-xoops/ * http://themes.freshmeat.net/projects/aquafusion/
And http://www.maxpower.ca/free-icons/2006/03/05/
Lets pick one, or go for the best option: volunteer to design a Drupal-specific set! :)
Bèr
[ End user Drupal services and hosting | Sympal.nl ]
Drupal upgrade repareert kritiek beveiligingslek: http://help.sympal.nl/ drupal_upgrade_repareert_kritiek_beveiligingslek _______________________________________________ themes mailing list themes@drupal.org http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
themes mailing list themes@drupal.org http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
themes mailing list themes@drupal.org http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes