It's such a shame to see such a great base of icons shunned due to licensing issues. I personally know the people who work on these icons, and the intent is for them to be used by the community. :/
On 5/30/06, grohk grohk@code0range.net wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Trae McCombs wrote:
I am in favor of the 2nd. I don't see the problem behind the CC
license.
It's non-code. Sure, I'm all for GPL when it comes to source code, but when it's an image or document or whatever, what does it matter?
It does matter, since there are a number of CC licenses to chose from and changing the policy to allow for these would be non-trivial. The license in question has an attribution clause which can be interpreted in several ways I guess, but in my mind would force each site that uses the icons to attribute the original author. The GPL makes no such demand.
I am in favor of option 1.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEfKZlO+lwfsap+f0RAoL5AJ9Joo99tmzQjqQ8A1FmIndFuWEOxgCfeXRZ PhfHkMc+1AEx8eZvdqiRkbo= =pHLs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ themes mailing list themes@drupal.org http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes