-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Trae McCombs wrote:
I am in favor of the 2nd. I don't see the problem behind the CC license. It's non-code. Sure, I'm all for GPL when it comes to source code, but when it's an image or document or whatever, what does it matter?
It does matter, since there are a number of CC licenses to chose from and changing the policy to allow for these would be non-trivial. The license in question has an attribution clause which can be interpreted in several ways I guess, but in my mind would force each site that uses the icons to attribute the original author. The GPL makes no such demand. I am in favor of option 1. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEfKZlO+lwfsap+f0RAoL5AJ9Joo99tmzQjqQ8A1FmIndFuWEOxgCfeXRZ PhfHkMc+1AEx8eZvdqiRkbo= =pHLs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----