[drupal-devel] Let's accept more interim solutions
Jose A. Reyero
jareyero at wanadoo.es
Fri Apr 22 09:22:59 UTC 2005
I completely agree with Ber on this one.
And I think we should go for a smaller core and then some distributions
with pre-packaged modules and specific patches. And we should start
separating concepts like 'Drupal core' and 'standard distribution'.
Bèr Kessels wrote:
>A big -1 from me. Drupals core must be small, clean and most of all very
>I beleive Drupal would benefit most from a linux alike idea: kernel and
>distro;s. A kernel (drupal core) is very conservative, vey well maintained
>and very strict in what it accepts. Its up to the distros to add modules,
>themes and pre-configured databases and ship that as their distro. And off
>course a distro could ship with patches applied to its particular core. For
>example a DrupalI18N would be a nice distro.
>But to allow "interim" solutions? naah. I think it will bring down our overall
>quality a lot. And it will make our porject a lot harder to maintain, since
>our CVS will be in a constant status of no--really-working. Much more than
More information about the drupal-devel