[development] let's cleanup /misc

vlado vlado at dikini.net
Fri Jan 6 11:52:38 UTC 2006

> Is 'all' better than the current 'default', or will we have both  
> 'all' and 'default'?
default (currently) means the default website
all means for all websites

Definitely the all functionality can be rolled into default, but that
might be confusing. I personally would prefer the separate version, it
allows treating the default site as any other.

> How about the simpler:
>   sites/all/javascript
>   sites/all/stylesheets
>   sites/all/images
sure, it makes sense

> > *  */vendor  is a worthy contender to consider - this way we won't mix
> >   drupal and non-drupal code too much - this will be easier to upgrade
> >   but otherwise I don't have an idea on all implications
> I don't see the point of 'vendor'.
Well, the only point I see is not to mix drupal and non-drupal code. The
equivalent in the linux world will be /opt and /usr/local - you put
there things that are not coming with the distribution, so you are
responsible for their upgrades and maintenance. 

For example:
the various Javascript based editors - they don't come with drupal, only
their integration modules.

More information about the development mailing list