[development] Desperate plea for help on the GHOP program
larry at garfieldtech.com
Tue Dec 11 16:00:32 UTC 2007
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:25:25 +0200, adrian rossouw <adrian at bryght.com> wrote:
>>> perhaps check for some other simple modules that haven't been
>>> ported to 6 yet ? cross reference something like LOC (not really a
>>> good indicator, but still) versus their positions in the d.o usage
>> Another lovely idea! Adrian, you rock. ;)
> I'd be willing to help put tasks together for this, but i'd need
> access to the metrics, and the downloads.
We had proposals for a couple of "upgrade this module" tasks, but if we could get usage metrics to pick a couple from, that would be even better.
The catch here is that we really do need the contrib author's buy-in, because they will need to review whatever patch the student submits.
> Perhaps we could make one of the items in the upgrade task , that
> they should document what questions they have about the functioning
> of the module,
> so we can create documentation tasks for modules that require it.
> Even more so, we have programmers documentation (doxygen) we could
> write tasks for as well. Writing Doxygen would give them a good
> understanding of
> how the modules are put together too.
One is in progress. I'm hoping that after it's closed we can re-open it for another student to do a few more core modules.
This one was already completed, which totally rocks:
More information about the development