fusion94 at damagestudios.net
Tue Jul 3 22:43:08 UTC 2007
One thing to consider is whether or not we can implement a group of
committed reviewers to spend time ensuring that patches get tested and
marked RTBC via the committee.
<fusion94 at gmail.com>fusion94 at damagestudios.net
<fusion94 at gmail.com><fusion94 at gmail.com>
On 7/3/07, Peter Wolanin <pwolanin at gmail.com> wrote:
> In regards to this - I did try to highlight to the devel list
> small/discrete features that were marked RTBC, but possibly
> overlooked: http://groups.drupal.org/node/4943
> Probably it was too little too late, and perhaps points out what a
> valuable service Augustin provided during the D5 cycle. Maybe
> recruiting a couple people (especially those interested in
> contributing but without the desire to file/review core patches) to
> compile such analyses of the issue queue during the D7 cycle would
> help the process?
> On 7/3/07, Chris Johnson <cxjohnson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In my experience, often RTBC patches which are many weeks old just
> > didn't get the attention and general approval of the appropriate
> > influential developers. The code can be perfect, the design can be
> > perfect, but if the issue isn't interesting, the patch can languish.
> > I should like to note that this has improved over the years, so we are
> > at least heading in the right direction.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the development