[development] FAQ: Why is Drupal still using CVS when X is a much better choice?
gerhard at killesreiter.de
Thu Jul 31 08:21:36 UTC 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Derek Wright schrieb:
> Also, what Adam wrote is still incredibly relevant for the drupal.org
> implications of versioncontrol API and friends:
> A) How do "we" decide which RCS to move to, assuming everything else
> is in place?
Note that I am not convinced that we need to move at all. :p
> B) Who's the "we" who makes this decision?
The drupal.org infratructure team based on the input of the developer
Any change to the core repo is basically dependend on Dries' approval.
> Further, I'd add the following for everyone to chew over:
> C) Do we move everything at once, or do we just move core to the new
> thing, and leave contrib with CVS as an interim measure to prevent
> large-scale, simultaneous catastrophe on all sides? ;)
I think that assuming we 1) want to move at all 2) manage to agree on
a system to move to and 3) Dries agrees with this would be a good
> D) Do we leave open the possibility that each project on d.o can
> choose if it wants CVS or XXX?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the development