[development] Body and teaser as fields

[Victor Kane]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Ronald Ashri <ronald at istos.it> wrote:

Agreed, absolutely. But these example content types should be constructed in
the same way anyone would construct one, and there should be no magical
behavior associated with any of their fields that are not associated with
any others anyone might make.

Victor

 victor: As for having default content types I think there are two levels -
> Drupal as a system/framework should not assume anything but a fresh
> installation should give a user(especially a new one that is probably just
> exploring the system) some types to work with, even if it is just a way to
> illustrate that different types that are possible. If the first thing a new
> user has to do is actually create a content type then we lost them right
> there...
>
> Best,
>
> Ronald
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20090212/db2aec31/attachment.htm