[development] Body and teaser as fields

[Earnie Boyd]

Quoting Victor Kane <victorkane at gmail.com>:

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Ronald Ashri <ronald at istos.it> wrote:
>
> Agreed, absolutely. But these example content types should be constructed in
> the same way anyone would construct one, and there should be no magical
> behavior associated with any of their fields that are not associated with
> any others anyone might make.
>
> Victor
>
> victor: As for having default content types I think there are two levels -
>> Drupal as a system/framework should not assume anything but a fresh
>> installation should give a user(especially a new one that is probably just
>> exploring the system) some types to work with, even if it is just a way to
>> illustrate that different types that are possible. If the first thing a new
>> user has to do is actually create a content type then we lost them right
>> there...
>>

How about making the default content types a configurable item for the 
install profile?

--
Earnie  http://r-feed.com
  Make a Drupal difference and review core patches.

-- http://for-my-kids.com/  -- http://give-me-an-offer.com/