[themes] Re: themes Digest, Vol 6, Issue 23

Eric Carroll eric at visualnotion.com
Wed May 31 16:21:59 UTC 2006


Is there a list of topics or items that need icons?
--------------------------------------
Eric Carroll
drupal.org ID: vnotion
eric at visualnotion.com
--------------------------------------



On May 31, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Eric Carroll wrote:

> I , too, like this one. It looks clean without having too many  
> gradients and whatnot going on.
>
> Although, I do like the idea of having an icon set that was created  
> for Drupal. I am not sure how much time I could devote to it, but I  
> have some other contacts that may be interested in helping as well.
> --------------------------------------
> Eric Carroll
> drupal.org ID: vnotion
> eric at visualnotion.com
> --------------------------------------
>
>
> On May 31, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Øivind Binde wrote:
>
>> I would give my vote too this icon package:
>> http://www.silvestre.com.ar/wp-content/uploaded/Neu-0.6-PR3.tar.bz2
>>
>> morphir
>>
>> themes-request at drupal.org wrote:
>>> Send themes mailing list submissions to
>>> 	themes at drupal.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> 	http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> 	themes-request at drupal.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> 	themes-owner at drupal.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of themes digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>    1. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
>>>       (Christian Berg)
>>>    2. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (Laura  
>>> Scott)
>>>    3. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (Trae  
>>> McCombs)
>>>    4. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (grohk)
>>>    5. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
>>>       (Vladimir Zlatanov)
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> --
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 22:55:22 +0200
>>> From: Christian Berg <xeniac at gmx.at>
>>> Subject: Re: [themes] Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
>>> To: A list for theme developers <themes at drupal.org>
>>> Message-ID: <1149022522.8924.16.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>>
>>> Just an idea for Drupal 4.99: Icon-Themes!
>>>
>>> Booth GNOME and KDE have support for themes AND icon-themes.
>>> Maybe we could add an slick and KISS way for this feature.
>>> theme('icon','apply');
>>> If somebody want's an Tango-Iconset, we could host something like  
>>> this
>>> on an external Drupal "Fan-Page".
>>>
>>> Additional: Many New Drupal-Contrib Themes are based on oswd.org
>>> Designs, that have some restrictions too.
>>> for example the andreas01 Theme based on the andreas01 oswd.org  
>>> Design:
>>>
>>> "If you like this layout and would like to use it in any way, you  
>>> are
>>> free to do so. All I ask for is that you leave the "Design by  
>>> Andreas
>>> Viklund" link in the footer of the site. If you would like to remove
>>> that line, or if you are interested in professional services that  
>>> are
>>> related to webdesign or this layout (such as custom design,  
>>> branding,
>>> scripting or programming), please contact me through my website  
>>> for more
>>> information!"
>>>
>>> Sounds Simmilar to the "CC Bronze" Restrictions to me.
>>>
>>> Maybe Drupal Developers should split up the Code from the  
>>> Presentation
>>> also on their Repositories.
>>> Drupal.org only hosts Drupal Core and Drupal Code that is  
>>> absolutly GPL.
>>> Drupal-Mods.net or something simmilar hosts a collection of
>>> Drupal-Themes, -Hacks, -Mods, Icon-Themes, Whatever, related to  
>>> Drupal
>>> but with other licenses.
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, den 30.05.2006, 22:22 +0200 schrieb Bèr Kessels:
>>>
>>>> We should find an alternaive that does allow us to go for GPL.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:08:21 -0600
>>> From: Laura Scott <laura at pingv.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [themes] Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
>>> To: A list for theme developers <themes at drupal.org>
>>> Cc: infrastructure at drupal.org
>>> Message-ID: <6C281D70-6F88-4F04-AEAC-056205968897 at pingv.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes;  
>>> format=flowed
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if we're not trying to apply mileage standards to
>>> bicycles. As far as I know, the GPL is about software, not about  
>>> images.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The licenses for most software are designed to take away your
>>>> freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public
>>>> License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change
>>>> free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users.
>>>> This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software
>>>> Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit
>>>> to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is
>>>> covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can
>>>> apply it to your programs, too.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I may be wrong, but don't believe you can GPL an image any more than
>>> you can copyright a lawn. We're talking about different kinds of
>>> licensing, different kinds of works. An image isn't software. The
>>> image format could be considered software, so we could require that
>>> images not be in any proprietary format, such as PSD or ia. But that
>>> doesn't get to the creative property aspects.
>>>
>>> I humbly suggest focusing on the goal, and not on the means. GPL
>>> itself is not manna. Its values are what we seek, no?
>>>
>>> The closest thing I can find is the Creative Commons Share Alike
>>> license. However, I cannot seem to find it anywhere on their  
>>> website.
>>> All of their pre-configured licenses for images require attribution,
>>> which defeats the stated goals here. But Share Alike (with the  
>>> arrow-
>>> circle icon) seems to capture exactly what we're after:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Share Alike. You allow others to distribute derivative works only
>>>> under a license identical to the license that governs your work.
>>>>
>>>
>>> http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses
>>>
>>> The other approach would be to require a Public Domain Dedication of
>>> the image elements. http://creativecommons.org/license/
>>> publicdomain-2  (I note that CC states this might not be enforceable
>>> outside of the US.)
>>>
>>> Laura
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 30, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Bèr Kessels wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Summary so far:It has been decided we cannot use tango. So let  
>>>> us move
>>>> forward.
>>>>
>>>> We should find an alternaive that does allow us to go for GPL.
>>>>
>>>> Here are some possibilities:
>>>>
>>>>     * BlueSphere: http://svgicons.sourceforge.net/ -- SVG, so
>>>> resizeable
>>>>       without distortion. BSD licence. See also
>>>>       http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=4276
>>>>     * Shiira: http://hmdt-web.net/shiira/icon-e.html -- several  
>>>> good
>>>>       options imho.
>>>>     * idesk: http://idesk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>>> (not
>>>>       sure if this has icons or is just a desktop tool)
>>>>     * FreeIcons: http://realopen.org/projects/fics/
>>>>     * Marbles? http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?
>>>> content=1581 --
>>>>       not sure about licence
>>>>     * XOOPS icons: http://www.nongnu.org/matt-xoops/
>>>>     * http://themes.freshmeat.net/projects/aquafusion/
>>>>
>>>> And http://www.maxpower.ca/free-icons/2006/03/05/
>>>>
>>>> Lets pick one, or go for the best option: volunteer to design a
>>>> Drupal-specific set! :)
>>>>
>>>> Bèr
>>>> -- 
>>>> [ End user Drupal services and hosting | Sympal.nl ]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Drupal upgrade repareert kritiek beveiligingslek:
>>>>  http://help.sympal.nl/
>>>> drupal_upgrade_repareert_kritiek_beveiligingslek
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> themes mailing list
>>>> themes at drupal.org
>>>> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:15:32 -0400
>>> From: "Trae McCombs" <traemccombs at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [themes] Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
>>> To: "A list for theme developers" <themes at drupal.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>> 	<b4fcd9cb0605301515w2dc82192k619ccc2e93ad2e80 at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> http://jimmac.musichall.cz/i.php?i=git2
>>>
>>> Jakub pointed this out to me.  It follows the Tango Guidelines,  
>>> yet is GPL.
>>> Perhaps it would be the most suitable replacement.
>>>
>>> Someone could have suggested this already, sorry if I missed it. :)
>>>
>>> Trae
>>>
>>> On 5/30/06, Laura Scott <laura at pingv.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm wondering if we're not trying to apply mileage standards to
>>>> bicycles. As far as I know, the GPL is about software, not about  
>>>> images.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The licenses for most software are designed to take away your
>>>>> freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General  
>>>>> Public
>>>>> License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change
>>>>> free software--to make sure the software is free for all its  
>>>>> users.
>>>>> This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software
>>>>> Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors  
>>>>> commit
>>>>> to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is
>>>>> covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can
>>>>> apply it to your programs, too.
>>>>>
>>>> I may be wrong, but don't believe you can GPL an image any more  
>>>> than
>>>> you can copyright a lawn. We're talking about different kinds of
>>>> licensing, different kinds of works. An image isn't software. The
>>>> image format could be considered software, so we could require that
>>>> images not be in any proprietary format, such as PSD or ia. But  
>>>> that
>>>> doesn't get to the creative property aspects.
>>>>
>>>> I humbly suggest focusing on the goal, and not on the means. GPL
>>>> itself is not manna. Its values are what we seek, no?
>>>>
>>>> The closest thing I can find is the Creative Commons Share Alike
>>>> license. However, I cannot seem to find it anywhere on their  
>>>> website.
>>>> All of their pre-configured licenses for images require  
>>>> attribution,
>>>> which defeats the stated goals here. But Share Alike (with the  
>>>> arrow-
>>>> circle icon) seems to capture exactly what we're after:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Share Alike. You allow others to distribute derivative works only
>>>>> under a license identical to the license that governs your work.
>>>>>
>>>> http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses
>>>>
>>>> The other approach would be to require a Public Domain  
>>>> Dedication of
>>>> the image elements. http://creativecommons.org/license/
>>>> publicdomain-2  (I note that CC states this might not be  
>>>> enforceable
>>>> outside of the US.)
>>>>
>>>> Laura
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 30, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Bèr Kessels wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Summary so far:It has been decided we cannot use tango. So let  
>>>>> us move
>>>>> forward.
>>>>>
>>>>> We should find an alternaive that does allow us to go for GPL.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are some possibilities:
>>>>>
>>>>>     * BlueSphere: http://svgicons.sourceforge.net/ -- SVG, so
>>>>> resizeable
>>>>>       without distortion. BSD licence. See also
>>>>>       http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=4276
>>>>>     * Shiira: http://hmdt-web.net/shiira/icon-e.html -- several  
>>>>> good
>>>>>       options imho.
>>>>>     * idesk: http://idesk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>>>> (not
>>>>>       sure if this has icons or is just a desktop tool)
>>>>>     * FreeIcons: http://realopen.org/projects/fics/
>>>>>     * Marbles? http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?
>>>>> content=1581 --
>>>>>       not sure about licence
>>>>>     * XOOPS icons: http://www.nongnu.org/matt-xoops/
>>>>>     * http://themes.freshmeat.net/projects/aquafusion/
>>>>>
>>>>> And http://www.maxpower.ca/free-icons/2006/03/05/
>>>>>
>>>>> Lets pick one, or go for the best option: volunteer to design a
>>>>> Drupal-specific set! :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Bèr
>>>>> --
>>>>> [ End user Drupal services and hosting | Sympal.nl ]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Drupal upgrade repareert kritiek beveiligingslek:
>>>>>  http://help.sympal.nl/
>>>>> drupal_upgrade_repareert_kritiek_beveiligingslek
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> themes mailing list
>>>>> themes at drupal.org
>>>>> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> themes mailing list
>>>> themes at drupal.org
>>>> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> themes mailing list
>> themes at drupal.org
>> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> themes mailing list
> themes at drupal.org
> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
>
>



More information about the themes mailing list