I'll be +1 on code names, so long as one is borg :) Robin PS: codenames of all sorts, +1 On 9/19/06, Trae McCombs <traemccombs@gmail.com> wrote:
"Ya'll hear that, we're usin' code names!" - Raising Arizona
Richard, please just go with a +1 or -1 for the idea. While "silly" isn't exactly a bad form of expression if everyone used their personal opinion it could get ugly.
For the record, I'm +1 on code names. :)
Peace, love and bananas. Trae
On 9/19/06, Richard Archer < drupal.org@juggernaut.com.au> wrote:
At 10:49 PM +0200 19/9/06, Derek Wright wrote:
i get the sense i'm in the minority thinking that this late binding is a) unnecessary and b) costly. however, if i can't win that battle, i'll wholeheartedly support using code names instead of the terrible options we currently use ("cvs", "HEAD", etc).
Well, I'm right there with you.
Names for code are just plain silly.
...R.
-- Trae McCombs || http://occy.net/ Founder - Themes.org // Linux.com
-- Robin Monks, CivicSpace Release Engineer - http://civicspacelabs.com Drupal Marketing Coordinator - http://drupal.org Encrypt! http://tinyurl.com/ffo3l - http://www.gpg4win.org/