On 04/28/2013 12:17 PM, support-request@drupal.org wrote:
Send support mailing list submissions to support@drupal.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/support or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to support-request@drupal.org
You can reach the person managing the list at support-owner@drupal.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of support digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: WSOD when using Add content type. (Earnie Boyd) 2. how to access Drupal base URL (Ijlal EL HAZITI) 3. Re: how to access Drupal base URL (Joe Corneli) 4. Re: how to access Drupal base URL (Ijlal EL HAZITI) 5. Re: how to access Drupal base URL (Joe Corneli) 6. Re: how to access Drupal base URL (Ijlal EL HAZITI) 7. elms cannot be loaded (Ijlal EL HAZITI) 8. Re: elms cannot be loaded (Walt Daniels)
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 11:43:23 -0400 From: Earnie Boyd earnie@users.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [support] WSOD when using Add content type. To: support@drupal.org Message-ID: CA+sc5mno=tT7t1E1tUomUJx0ZG32yS1ygjBtUnvdBmNBp2hRJg@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Roger wrote:
If I shut down Pathauto and Token the system runs at lightening speed. Maybe someone with php skills can rewrite Token and Pathauto Cheers
Or maybe you should find a host provider that allows you to adjust to more memory for PHP? Or maybe your current provider has a plan that will allow it but you have to pay a little more?
I'm flabbergasted!, astonished, cannot believe my eyes with the above comment. - That it occurs is it'self an issue in need of a resolution. - That it has been unresolved for years should signal a need for resolution. - Many computers suffer, not all of which are servers, It's not good to blame the customer/user for everything. - Shifting from suspect modules toward innocent parties, solves what exactly? - Why should a user be forced into a higher price plan when 2 modules seem to have been a long standing issue.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Roger wrote:
I'm flabbergasted!, astonished, cannot believe my eyes with the above comment.
- That it occurs is it'self an issue in need of a resolution.
- That it has been unresolved for years should signal a need for resolution.
- Many computers suffer, not all of which are servers, It's not good to
blame the customer/user for everything.
- Shifting from suspect modules toward innocent parties, solves what
exactly?
- Why should a user be forced into a higher price plan when 2 modules
seem to have been a long standing issue.
I have used/am using both of these modules and on various hosts with no issues. So if the user needs to add many more modules than will fit in his allotted memory footprint then he needs to either remove some modules (which he did), move to a new host or pay for an increased footprint, or make changes to modules he finds issues with offering patches to the community.
-
Earnie Boyd -
Roger