Roger, you probably should ?reply? to the original thread rather than creating new ones. Although I'm since I am new to this list, I may not realize all the implications and this may be due to the way you access it.
Cheers,
cj
Thanks CJ
The subject line has me tossed. support Digest, Vol 96, Issue 21 isn't really helpful and if I change the subject line to the previous post subject it seems to start a new thread. What is the best way to keep a thread going? Thanks Roger
Roger wrote:
The subject line has me tossed. support Digest, Vol 96, Issue 21 isn't really helpful and if I change the subject line to the previous post subject it seems to start a new thread. What is the best way to keep a thread going? Thanks Roger
Use a mail client that supports replying to the individual message of a digest or maybe find the mail in the archive and use the reply functionality of the archive service if it has one. But with your current client please do change the Subject back to the original subject line even if it is going to create a new thread id because it makes it easier to connect the threads.
I think it's also how you ask the mail daemon to deliver the digest to you, if you've set digest mode. If you are receiving digests, make sure you're getting MIME and not plain text digests so that there are individual messages to reply to.
Anthony.
On 6:59 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Roger wrote:
The subject line has me tossed. support Digest, Vol 96, Issue 21 isn't really helpful and if I change the subject line to the previous post subject it seems to start a new thread. What is the best way to keep a thread going? Thanks Roger
Use a mail client that supports replying to the individual message of a digest or maybe find the mail in the archive and use the reply functionality of the archive service if it has one. But with your current client please do change the Subject back to the original subject line even if it is going to create a new thread id because it makes it easier to connect the threads.
-
Anth -
Earnie Boyd -
Roger