After some cantankerousness with CVS, I have finally gotten this checked
in. :-/
http://drupal.org/node/66150
This is intended as a sample theme for other themers. It is just Bluemarine
redone to use "Holy Grail" layout, a 3 column pure-CSS layout described here:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/holygrail
Hopefully it will prove useful to others, including those working on the new
default theme (or not, if they're going a different direction). Enjoy, all!
--
Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42
larry(a)garfieldtech.com ICQ: 6817012
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea,
which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession
of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it." -- Thomas
Jefferson
Just an FYI. Did an article on porting the Yahoo Grid CSS over for use
with Drupal. It turned out to be remarkably easy to do the 2 column. I
have a three column (1/2 or 1/2/3) base page.tpl.php figured out and
will by writing that up as well. I know how to do a more flexible 3
column base (1/2, or 1/2/3 or 2/3) but just need to site down and work
out all the bugs and write it up in the next week or two as well. I can
see 4 column with regions being very easy now too as a next step.
As I get a better understanding of what I am doing I'll convert these to
handbook pages.
http://www.blkmtn.org/node/336
Some of the css is sloppy but http://scratch.blkmtn.org is using the
Yahoo Grid css now. I will probably be converting my site's theme over
to it as well.
Ref: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/grids/
I would give my vote too this icon package:
http://www.silvestre.com.ar/wp-content/uploaded/Neu-0.6-PR3.tar.bz2
morphir
themes-request(a)drupal.org wrote:
> Send themes mailing list submissions to
> themes(a)drupal.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> themes-request(a)drupal.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> themes-owner(a)drupal.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of themes digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
> (Christian Berg)
> 2. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (Laura Scott)
> 3. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (Trae McCombs)
> 4. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL. (grohk)
> 5. Re: Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
> (Vladimir Zlatanov)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 22:55:22 +0200
> From: Christian Berg <xeniac(a)gmx.at>
> Subject: Re: [themes] Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
> To: A list for theme developers <themes(a)drupal.org>
> Message-ID: <1149022522.8924.16.camel(a)localhost.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Just an idea for Drupal 4.99: Icon-Themes!
>
> Booth GNOME and KDE have support for themes AND icon-themes.
> Maybe we could add an slick and KISS way for this feature.
> theme('icon','apply');
> If somebody want's an Tango-Iconset, we could host something like this
> on an external Drupal "Fan-Page".
>
> Additional: Many New Drupal-Contrib Themes are based on oswd.org
> Designs, that have some restrictions too.
> for example the andreas01 Theme based on the andreas01 oswd.org Design:
>
> "If you like this layout and would like to use it in any way, you are
> free to do so. All I ask for is that you leave the "Design by Andreas
> Viklund" link in the footer of the site. If you would like to remove
> that line, or if you are interested in professional services that are
> related to webdesign or this layout (such as custom design, branding,
> scripting or programming), please contact me through my website for more
> information!"
>
> Sounds Simmilar to the "CC Bronze" Restrictions to me.
>
> Maybe Drupal Developers should split up the Code from the Presentation
> also on their Repositories.
> Drupal.org only hosts Drupal Core and Drupal Code that is absolutly GPL.
> Drupal-Mods.net or something simmilar hosts a collection of
> Drupal-Themes, -Hacks, -Mods, Icon-Themes, Whatever, related to Drupal
> but with other licenses.
>
> Am Dienstag, den 30.05.2006, 22:22 +0200 schrieb Bèr Kessels:
>
>> We should find an alternaive that does allow us to go for GPL.
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:08:21 -0600
> From: Laura Scott <laura(a)pingv.com>
> Subject: Re: [themes] Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
> To: A list for theme developers <themes(a)drupal.org>
> Cc: infrastructure(a)drupal.org
> Message-ID: <6C281D70-6F88-4F04-AEAC-056205968897(a)pingv.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> I'm wondering if we're not trying to apply mileage standards to
> bicycles. As far as I know, the GPL is about software, not about images.
>
>
>> The licenses for most software are designed to take away your
>> freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public
>> License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change
>> free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users.
>> This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software
>> Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit
>> to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is
>> covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can
>> apply it to your programs, too.
>>
>
> I may be wrong, but don't believe you can GPL an image any more than
> you can copyright a lawn. We're talking about different kinds of
> licensing, different kinds of works. An image isn't software. The
> image format could be considered software, so we could require that
> images not be in any proprietary format, such as PSD or ia. But that
> doesn't get to the creative property aspects.
>
> I humbly suggest focusing on the goal, and not on the means. GPL
> itself is not manna. Its values are what we seek, no?
>
> The closest thing I can find is the Creative Commons Share Alike
> license. However, I cannot seem to find it anywhere on their website.
> All of their pre-configured licenses for images require attribution,
> which defeats the stated goals here. But Share Alike (with the arrow-
> circle icon) seems to capture exactly what we're after:
>
>
>> Share Alike. You allow others to distribute derivative works only
>> under a license identical to the license that governs your work.
>>
>
> http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses
>
> The other approach would be to require a Public Domain Dedication of
> the image elements. http://creativecommons.org/license/
> publicdomain-2 (I note that CC states this might not be enforceable
> outside of the US.)
>
> Laura
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 30, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Bèr Kessels wrote:
>
>
>> Summary so far:It has been decided we cannot use tango. So let us move
>> forward.
>>
>> We should find an alternaive that does allow us to go for GPL.
>>
>> Here are some possibilities:
>>
>> * BlueSphere: http://svgicons.sourceforge.net/ -- SVG, so
>> resizeable
>> without distortion. BSD licence. See also
>> http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=4276
>> * Shiira: http://hmdt-web.net/shiira/icon-e.html -- several good
>> options imho.
>> * idesk: http://idesk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>> (not
>> sure if this has icons or is just a desktop tool)
>> * FreeIcons: http://realopen.org/projects/fics/
>> * Marbles? http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?
>> content=1581 --
>> not sure about licence
>> * XOOPS icons: http://www.nongnu.org/matt-xoops/
>> * http://themes.freshmeat.net/projects/aquafusion/
>>
>> And http://www.maxpower.ca/free-icons/2006/03/05/
>>
>> Lets pick one, or go for the best option: volunteer to design a
>> Drupal-specific set! :)
>>
>> Bèr
>> --
>> [ End user Drupal services and hosting | Sympal.nl ]
>>
>>
>> Drupal upgrade repareert kritiek beveiligingslek:
>> http://help.sympal.nl/
>> drupal_upgrade_repareert_kritiek_beveiligingslek
>> _______________________________________________
>> themes mailing list
>> themes(a)drupal.org
>> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:15:32 -0400
> From: "Trae McCombs" <traemccombs(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [themes] Tango iconset: Default for drupal, is NOT GPL.
> To: "A list for theme developers" <themes(a)drupal.org>
> Message-ID:
> <b4fcd9cb0605301515w2dc82192k619ccc2e93ad2e80(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> http://jimmac.musichall.cz/i.php?i=git2
>
> Jakub pointed this out to me. It follows the Tango Guidelines, yet is GPL.
> Perhaps it would be the most suitable replacement.
>
> Someone could have suggested this already, sorry if I missed it. :)
>
> Trae
>
> On 5/30/06, Laura Scott <laura(a)pingv.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering if we're not trying to apply mileage standards to
>> bicycles. As far as I know, the GPL is about software, not about images.
>>
>>
>>> The licenses for most software are designed to take away your
>>> freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public
>>> License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change
>>> free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users.
>>> This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software
>>> Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit
>>> to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is
>>> covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can
>>> apply it to your programs, too.
>>>
>> I may be wrong, but don't believe you can GPL an image any more than
>> you can copyright a lawn. We're talking about different kinds of
>> licensing, different kinds of works. An image isn't software. The
>> image format could be considered software, so we could require that
>> images not be in any proprietary format, such as PSD or ia. But that
>> doesn't get to the creative property aspects.
>>
>> I humbly suggest focusing on the goal, and not on the means. GPL
>> itself is not manna. Its values are what we seek, no?
>>
>> The closest thing I can find is the Creative Commons Share Alike
>> license. However, I cannot seem to find it anywhere on their website.
>> All of their pre-configured licenses for images require attribution,
>> which defeats the stated goals here. But Share Alike (with the arrow-
>> circle icon) seems to capture exactly what we're after:
>>
>>
>>> Share Alike. You allow others to distribute derivative works only
>>> under a license identical to the license that governs your work.
>>>
>> http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses
>>
>> The other approach would be to require a Public Domain Dedication of
>> the image elements. http://creativecommons.org/license/
>> publicdomain-2 (I note that CC states this might not be enforceable
>> outside of the US.)
>>
>> Laura
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 30, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Bèr Kessels wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Summary so far:It has been decided we cannot use tango. So let us move
>>> forward.
>>>
>>> We should find an alternaive that does allow us to go for GPL.
>>>
>>> Here are some possibilities:
>>>
>>> * BlueSphere: http://svgicons.sourceforge.net/ -- SVG, so
>>> resizeable
>>> without distortion. BSD licence. See also
>>> http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=4276
>>> * Shiira: http://hmdt-web.net/shiira/icon-e.html -- several good
>>> options imho.
>>> * idesk: http://idesk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>> (not
>>> sure if this has icons or is just a desktop tool)
>>> * FreeIcons: http://realopen.org/projects/fics/
>>> * Marbles? http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?
>>> content=1581 --
>>> not sure about licence
>>> * XOOPS icons: http://www.nongnu.org/matt-xoops/
>>> * http://themes.freshmeat.net/projects/aquafusion/
>>>
>>> And http://www.maxpower.ca/free-icons/2006/03/05/
>>>
>>> Lets pick one, or go for the best option: volunteer to design a
>>> Drupal-specific set! :)
>>>
>>> Bèr
>>> --
>>> [ End user Drupal services and hosting | Sympal.nl ]
>>>
>>>
>>> Drupal upgrade repareert kritiek beveiligingslek:
>>> http://help.sympal.nl/
>>> drupal_upgrade_repareert_kritiek_beveiligingslek
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> themes mailing list
>>> themes(a)drupal.org
>>> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> themes mailing list
>> themes(a)drupal.org
>> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Hello,
I only realised this today, but our guidelines speak about using tango as
default iconset. We abide these rules very well, in the contribs the mayority
if icons are indeed tango icons.
But they are not GPL, nor can they be distributed as such. We should address
this, and possibly choose another default iconset, or else change our
licencing policy.
«The Tango icons are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution
Share-Alike license. The palette is public domain, it can be used and
distributed freely. Developers, feel free to ship it along with your
application. The icon naming utilities are licensed under the GPL»
--- from http://tango-project.org/Tango_Desktop_Project
Bèr
Who took over those themes i posted about before, so i can update
their nodes ?
--
Adrian Rossouw
Drupal developer and Bryght Guy
http://drupal.org | http://bryght.com
Heine has presented an Outline to the docs list to tackle the theme dev guide and make it more up to date/usable. It may be that this can be moved there, we'll see what happens and how it develops. Having something in the handbook and moving it later is preferable to not having it in and people waiting ;)
-sp
> -----Original Message-----
> From: themes-bounces(a)drupal.org
> [mailto:themes-bounces@drupal.org] On Behalf Of Bèr Kessels
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 1:44 PM
> To: A list for theme developers
> Subject: Re: [themes] howto for buidling a frontpage using regions
>
> Op dinsdag 23 mei 2006 17:13, schreef Laura Scott:
> > On May 23, 2006, at 2:40 AM, Bèr Kessels wrote:
> > > FYI: Have a look here:
> > > http://drupal.org/node/65064
> > >
> > > Feel free to improve. ;)
> > >
> > > Bèr
> >
> > Nicely done! A couple of suggestions for clarity:
> >
> > * In the set-up paragraphs, make it clear that "bimbam" is the name
> > of the example theme. It's obvious to us, but newbies would benefit
> > from the extra clarity.
> >
> > * I would (re-)emphasize that "function bimbam_regions()"
> must be re-
> > named for the designer's theme being designed. This detail
> is missing
> > from a number of theme snippets, leading to much confusion.
>
> Calrified that with an extra sentence.
>
> > * The comment below notes that it's the blocks admin area, not the
> > node admin area. That's good. But the actual path to it is admin/
> > block, not admin/blocks -- not that anyone is going to paste that
> > into their browsers, but just to be dead-on.
>
> Changed this too.
>
> > Problematic, imho, is the placement of this page within the
> handbook.
>
> I put it under Howto's.
>
> > PS - As a point of procedure, should I put the top 3 * points in a
> > comment on the page, or is responding here better. Without any page
> > editing privileges, I have no idea how else to suggest
> > changes.
>
> For me the list is fine. After all: I mailed the list about this.
>
> Thanks for your time;
> Bèr
>
> --
> [ End user Drupal services and hosting | Sympal.nl ]
>
>
> CVS onder de knie krijgen:
> http://help.sympal.nl/cvs_onder_de_knie_krijgen
>
Just a reminder that there is a Drupal Courseware meeting today at
12:00pm PST.
The meeting was moved 2 hours earlier to facilitate more people in
other time zones to be there.
If you have an interest, please join us on #drupal-courseware today.
The agenda and volunteer todo's will be placed on http://
groups.drupal.org/curriculum soon.
--
Adrian Rossouw
Drupal developer and Bryght Guy
http://drupal.org | http://bryght.com